A recent trademark opposition decision shows that protecting your nutritional supplement trademark is good for overall brand health.
In Tom Miles v. Five Star Gourmet Foods, Inc., the Applicant (Five Star) sought to register the mark ENERGY2GO for fresh and packaged meals and snacks consisting primarily of vegetables, fruits, meats, cheese, and grains in International
A recent trademark opposition case shows that a trademark disclaimer can make a difference.
In Foundation Medicine, Inc. v. Alfred F. Czap, the Applicant sought registration of the trademark FOUNDATIONAL MEDICINE REVIEW for journals in the field of medicine. Foundation Medicine, Inc. opposed the application. In doing so, it relied on two prior registrations of
A pharmaceutical company named after the Lupine flower was successful in a recent trademark opposition before the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Background. In Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Ampel, LLC, the Applicant had filed for registration of the mark LuPPiN (in stylized characters) for education services and support groups pertaining to medical
A recent trademark opposition dispute has been decided between home healthcare competitors. This is another in a series of recent proceedings.
Background. In Right at Home LLC v. Love Right Home Care LLC, the Applicant, Love Right, sought registration of the mark LOVE RIGHT HOME CARE REFERRAL AGENCY. It disclaimed the exclusive right to “home
Two dental practices were the parties to a recent trademark opposition proceeding.
Background. In Timber Dental LLC v. Tooth LLC, the Applicant “Tooth” filed a trademark application for DENTISTRY DONE DIFFERENTLY for dentist services in International Class 44. The Applicant had to disclaim the term “”dentistry” separate and apart from the mark as shown.